A risk‐based framework for assessing real‐time lung cancer screening eligibility that incorporates life expectancy and past screening findings
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A risk‐based framework for assessing real‐time lung cancer screening eligibility that incorporates life expectancy and past screening findings
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
CANCER
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2021-08-12
DOI
10.1002/cncr.33835
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Screening for Lung Cancer
- (2021) et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Evaluation of the Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography
- (2021) Rafael Meza et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial
- (2020) Harry J. de Koning et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Risk-Based lung cancer screening: A systematic review
- (2020) Iakovos Toumazis et al. LUNG CANCER
- Identification of Candidates for Longer Lung Cancer Screening Intervals Following a Negative Low-Dose Computed Tomography Result
- (2019) Hilary A Robbins et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Contemporary Implications of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and Risk-Based Guidelines for Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility in the United States
- (2019) Rebecca Landy et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- A comparative modeling analysis of risk-based lung cancer screening strategies
- (2019) Kevin ten Haaf et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Life-Gained–Based Versus Risk-Based Selection of Smokers for Lung Cancer Screening
- (2019) Li C. Cheung et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Using Risk Models to Make Lung Cancer Screening Decisions: Evidence-Based and Getting Better
- (2019) Tanner J. Caverly et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Identifying Patients for Whom Lung Cancer Screening Is Preference-Sensitive
- (2018) Tanner J. Caverly et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Implications of Nine Risk Prediction Models for Selecting Ever-Smokers for Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening
- (2018) Hormuzd A. Katki et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Lung Cancer Screening, Version 3.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
- (2018) Douglas E. Wood et al. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- Smoking and Lung Cancer Mortality in the United States From 2015 to 2065
- (2018) Jihyoun Jeon et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing
- (2017) Jeff Bezanson et al. SIAM REVIEW
- Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: A retrospective validation study
- (2017) Kevin ten Haaf et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Pairing smoking-cessation services with lung cancer screening: A clinical guideline from the Association for the Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence and the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco
- (2016) Lisa M. Fucito et al. CANCER
- Development and Validation of Risk Models to Select Ever-Smokers for CT Lung Cancer Screening
- (2016) Hormuzd A. Katki et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Biennial lung cancer screening in Canada with smoking cessation—outcomes and cost-effectiveness
- (2016) John R. Goffin et al. LUNG CANCER
- Heterogeneity in Women’s Adherence and Its Role in Optimal Breast Cancer Screening Policies
- (2016) Turgay Ayer et al. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
- Symptoms and other factors associated with time to diagnosis and stage of lung cancer: a prospective cohort study
- (2015) F M Walter et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Comparative analysis of 5 lung cancer natural history and screening models that reproduce outcomes of the NLST and PLCO trials
- (2014) Rafael Meza et al. CANCER
- Lung cancer probability in patients with CT-detected pulmonary nodules: a prespecified analysis of data from the NELSON trial of low-dose CT screening
- (2014) Nanda Horeweg et al. LANCET ONCOLOGY
- Optimizing Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer Prevention and Surveillance
- (2014) Fatih Safa Erenay et al. M&SOM-Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
- Cost-Effectiveness of CT Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial
- (2014) William C. Black et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Benefits and Harms of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Strategies: A Comparative Modeling Study for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
- (2013) Harry J. de Koning et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Screening for Lung Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
- (2013) Virginia A. Moyer ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Selection Criteria for Lung-Cancer Screening
- (2013) Martin C. Tammemägi et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- OR Forum—A POMDP Approach to Personalize Mammography Screening Decisions
- (2012) Turgay Ayer et al. OPERATIONS RESEARCH
- Chapter 4: Development of the Counterfactual Smoking Histories Used to Assess the Effects of Tobacco Control
- (2012) Theodore R. Holford et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Comparing the benefits of screening for breast cancer and lung cancer using a novel natural history model
- (2011) Ray S. Lin et al. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
- Cost-Effectiveness of Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer in the United States
- (2011) Pamela M. McMahon et al. Journal of Thoracic Oncology
- Optimization of PSA Screening Policies
- (2011) Jingyu Zhang et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Baseline Characteristics of Participants in the Randomized National Lung Screening Trial
- (2010) et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Sensitivity and specificity of lung cancer screening using chest low-dose computed tomography
- (2008) Y Toyoda et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started