4.3 Article

Effects of fatigue on corticospinal excitability of the human knee extensors

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 101, Issue 12, Pages 1552-1564

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1113/EP085753

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In upper limb muscles, changes in afferent feedback, motoneurone excitability, and motor cortical output can contribute to failure of the central nervous system to recruit muscles fully during fatigue. It is not known whether similar changes occur with fatigue of muscles in the lower limb. We assessed the corticospinal pathway to vastus lateralis during fatiguing sustained maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of the knee extensors and during firing of fatigue-sensitive group III/IV muscle afferents maintained by postexercise ischaemia after fatiguing MVCs of the knee extensors and, separately, the flexors. In two experiments, subjects (n = 9) performed brief knee extensor MVCs before and after 2-min sustained MVCs of the knee extensors (experiment 1) or knee flexors (experiment 2). During MVCs, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex and thoracic motor evoked potentials (TMEPs) by electrical stimulation over the thoracic spine. During the 2-min extensor contraction, the size of vastus lateralis MEPs normalized to the maximal M-wave increased (P < 0.05), but normalized TMEPs were unchanged (P = 0.16). After the 2-min MVC, maintained firing of group III/IV muscle afferents had no effect on vastus lateralis MEPs or TMEPs (P = 0.18 and P = 0.50, respectively). Likewise, after the 2-min knee flexor MVC, maintained firing of these afferents showed no effect on vastus lateralis MEPs or TMEPs (P = 0.69 and P = 0.34, respectively). Motoneurones of vastus lateralis do not become less excitable during fatiguing isometric MVCs. Moreover, fatigue-sensitive group III/IV muscle afferents fail to affect the overall excitability of vastus lateralis motoneurones during MVCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available