4.0 Article

Detection of Adelges tsugae (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) wool using Velcro-covered balls

Journal

CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST
Volume 153, Issue 5, Pages 640-650

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.4039/tce.2021.24

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NRCan - Canadian Forest Service, SERG-I (Canadian Food Inspection Agency)
  2. Invasive Species Centre (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forests)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing the number of ball samples per tree and the number of trees in a stand, as well as the incidence of woolly masses on lower-crown branches, can increase the probability of detecting Adelges tsugae infestations.
Adelges tsugae Annand (Hemiptera: Adelgidae), a nonindigenous insect pest of hemlock (Tsuga spp.) (Pinaceae) in eastern North America, spends most of its life cycle within an ovisac, which resembles a woolly white mass on twigs. We evaluated the probability of detecting adelgid wool with Velcro(R)-covered balls when taking an increasing number of samples per tree (field sampling) and number of trees per simulated stand. We examined the relationship between the detection of adelgid wool using this technique and the incidence of A. tsugae-infested twigs by sampling lower-crown branch tips of the same trees. We found that the probability of detecting wool with ball sampling increased with number of ball samples per tree, with number of trees per simulated stand, and with increasing incidence of ovisacs in the lower crown. When sampling an individual tree, we found that 20 ball samples per tree achieved a targeted precision level of 0.75, but when sampling a stand, we found that 10 ball samples per tree took the least time for the range of simulated A. tsugae infestations we tested. These sample sizes are recommended for detection of A. tsugae infestations on an individual tree and in a hemlock stand.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available