4.4 Article

Machine Learning Model to Predict Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: The C.5 Decision Tree Approach

Journal

BRAIN INJURY
Volume 35, Issue 9, Pages 1095-1102

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1959060

Keywords

Machine learning; ventilator-associated pneumonia; traumatic brain injury; C; 5; decision tree model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study retrospectively investigated all adult TBI patients who were hospitalized in a level 1 trauma center between 2014 and 2019. The C.5 DT model achieved moderate performance in accuracy, area under the curve, precision, negative predictive value, sensitivity, specificity, and F-score.
Background There is paucity in the literature to predict the occurrence of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) in patients with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). We aimed to build a C.5. Decision Tree (C.5 DT) machine learning model to predict VAP in patients with moderate to severe TBI. Methods This was a retrospective study including all adult patients who were hospitalized with TBI plus head abbreviated injury scale (AIS) >= 3 and were mechanically ventilated in a level 1 trauma center between 2014 and 2019. Results A total of 772 eligible patients were enrolled, of them 169 had VAP (22%). The C.5 DT model achieved moderate performance with 83.5% accuracy, 80.5% area under the curve, 71% precision, 86% negative predictive value, 43% sensitivity, 95% specificity and 54% F-score. Out of 24 predictors, C.5 DT identified 5 variables predicting occurrence of VAP post-moderate to severe TBI (Time from injury to emergency department arrival, blood transfusion during resuscitation, comorbidities, Injury Severity Score and pneumothorax). Conclusions This study could serve as baseline for the quest of predicting VAP in patients with TBI through the utilization of C.5. DT machine learning approach. This model helps provide timely decision support to caregivers to improve patient's outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available