4.6 Article

Rhinovirus prevalence as indicator for efficacy of measures against SARS-CoV-2

Journal

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11178-w

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Rhinovirus; Bayesian; Modeling; Germany

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, project SECOVIT [01Kl20185B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By analyzing the prevalence data of respiratory viruses in Germany from 2010 to 2020, it was found that the prevalence of rhinovirus decreased significantly after the introduction of measures against SARS-CoV-2, showing a negative correlation with the stringency of anti-COVID-19 measures. Rhinovirus prevalence could possibly serve as an indicator of the efficacy of non-pharmaceutical measures against COVID-19.
Background Non-pharmaceutical measures to control the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) should be carefully tuned as they can impose a heavy social and economic burden. To quantify and possibly tune the efficacy of these anti-SARS-CoV-2 measures, we have devised indicators based on the abundant historic and current prevalence data from other respiratory viruses. Methods We obtained incidence data of 17 respiratory viruses from hospitalized patients and outpatients collected by 37 clinics and laboratories between 2010-2020 in Germany. With a probabilistic model for Bayes inference we quantified prevalence changes of the different viruses between months in the pre-pandemic period 2010-2019 and the corresponding months in 2020, the year of the pandemic with noninvasive measures of various degrees of stringency. Results We discovered remarkable reductions delta in rhinovirus (RV) prevalence by about 25% (95% highest density interval (HDI) [-0.35,-0.15]) in the months after the measures against SARS-CoV-2 were introduced in Germany. In the months after the measures began to ease, RV prevalence increased to low pre-pandemic levels, e.g. in August 2020 delta=-0.14 (95% HDI [-0.28,0.12]). Conclusions RV prevalence is negatively correlated with the stringency of anti-SARS-CoV-2 measures with only a short time delay. This result suggests that RV prevalence could possibly be an indicator for the efficiency for these measures. As RV is ubiquitous at higher prevalence than SARS-CoV-2 or other emerging respiratory viruses, it could reflect the efficacy of noninvasive measures better than such emerging viruses themselves with their unevenly spreading clusters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available