- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The three ghosts of medical AI: Can the black-box present deliver?
Authors
Keywords
Xai, Black-box, Ethics, Challenges, Transparency, Autonomy
Journal
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 102158
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2021-08-29
DOI
10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102158
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Towards multi-modal causability with Graph Neural Networks enabling information fusion for explainable AI
- (2021) Andreas Holzinger et al. Information Fusion
- DeepTRIAGE: interpretable and individualised biomarker scores using attention mechanism for the classification of breast cancer sub-types
- (2020) Adham Beykikhoshk et al. BMC Medical Genomics
- A Framework for Advancing Precision Medicine in Clinical Trials for Mental Disorders
- (2020) Eric J. Lenze et al. JAMA Psychiatry
- Deep in the Bowel: Highly Interpretable Neural Encoder-Decoder Networks Predict Gut Metabolites from Gut Microbiome
- (2020) Vuong Le et al. BMC GENOMICS
- Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety
- (2019) Robert Challen et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Reporting of artificial intelligence prediction models
- (2019) Gary S Collins et al. LANCET
- Machine Learning in Medicine
- (2019) Alvin Rajkomar et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Reporting guidelines for clinical trials evaluating artificial intelligence interventions are needed
- (2019) NATURE MEDICINE
- Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence
- (2019) Christopher J. Kelly et al. BMC Medicine
- On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare
- (2019) Thomas Grote et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning
- (2019) W. James Murdoch et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
- (2019) Ziad Obermeyer et al. SCIENCE
- Should Health Care Demand Interpretable Artificial Intelligence or Accept “Black Box” Medicine?
- (2019) Fei Wang et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- (2018) Amina Adadi et al. IEEE Access
- Computer knows best? The need for value-flexibility in medical AI
- (2018) Rosalind J McDougall JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- A guide to deep learning in healthcare
- (2018) Andre Esteva et al. NATURE MEDICINE
- High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
- (2018) Eric J. Topol NATURE MEDICINE
- Using a Deep Learning Algorithm and Integrated Gradients Explanation to Assist Grading for Diabetic Retinopathy
- (2018) Rory Sayres et al. OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Machine learning in medicine: Addressing ethical challenges
- (2018) Effy Vayena et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences
- (2018) Tim Miller ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
- Unintended Consequences of Machine Learning in Medicine
- (2017) Federico Cabitza et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs
- (2016) Varun Gulshan et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Towards precision medicine
- (2016) Euan A. Ashley NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
- Deep learning
- (2015) Yann LeCun et al. NATURE
- The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts
- (2015) Brent Daniel Mittelstadt et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- The rise and fall of supervised machine learning techniques
- (2011) L. J. Jensen et al. BIOINFORMATICS
- Avoiding Another AI Winter
- (2008) James Hendler IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started