Journal
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.116886
Keywords
Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS); Reservoir heterogeneity; Sustainable energy; Water loss; Sensitivity study; Discrete fracture model
Funding
- Islamic Development Bank, Saudi Arabia (IDB) [600027539]
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN-2014-06240]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study explored the impact of reservoir heterogeneity, water losses, well spacing, well orientation, regional flow direction, and injection temperature on system performance in EGS. Neglecting water losses and assuming a homogeneous reservoir were found to overestimate the system performance.
Electricity production from Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) is faced with premature thermal breakthrough due to the preferential flow path of the geofluid which is the consequence of the reservoir heterogeneity. Heat extraction investigation has been performed with assumptions of no water losses, isotropic and homogeneous reservoir. However, EGS reservoir is heterogeneous due to the preexistence of natural fractures and different formations. Water injection under high pressure causes water losses from reservoir boundaries to surrounding formations. Considering reservoir heterogeneity, permeability anisotropy, and water losses is required for reliable assessment of heat extraction. These important aspects were considered in this study and the effects of reservoir heterogeneity, water losses, wells spacing, wells orientation, regional flow direction, injection temperature on system performance with a discrete fractures model were analyzed. Neglecting water losses and assuming homogeneous reservoir overestimate the system performance. The maximum electric power is obtained for vertical wells with 540 m of wells spacing, the thermal breakthrough time is 25.6 years, and the average electric power is 9.7 MWe. Water losses from 0% to 10% lead to a decrease in energy efficiency from 2.4-2.2 to 2.3-2.1. The regional flow direction from the production well to the injection well improves the system performance.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available