Evolutionary Models and Phylogenetic Signal Assessment via Mantel Test
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Evolutionary Models and Phylogenetic Signal Assessment via Mantel Test
Authors
Keywords
Trait evolution, Brownian motion, Null model, Type I error, Statistical power
Journal
Evolutionary Biology
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages 135-143
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-10-19
DOI
10.1007/s11692-016-9396-1
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Phylogenetic niche conservatism - common pitfalls and ways forward
- (2015) Tamara Münkemüller et al. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
- Phylogenetic patterns are not proxies of community assembly mechanisms (they are far better)
- (2015) Pille Gerhold et al. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
- Choosing and using multiple traits in functional diversity research
- (2014) JONATHAN S. LEFCHECK et al. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
- Phylogenetic eigenvector regression in paleobiology
- (2014) José Alexandre F. Diniz-Filho et al. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PALEONTOLOGIA
- A Generalized K Statistic for Estimating Phylogenetic Signal from Shape and Other High-Dimensional Multivariate Data
- (2014) Dean C. Adams SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY
- Trees, branches and (square) roots: why evolutionary relatedness is not linearly related to functional distance
- (2014) Andrew D. Letten et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Dismantling the Mantel tests
- (2013) Gilles Guillot et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Ecophylogenetics: advances and perspectives
- (2012) Nicolas Mouquet et al. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
- ASSESSING PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL WITH MEASUREMENT ERROR: A COMPARISON OF MANTEL TESTS, BLOMBERG ET AL.'S K, AND PHYLOGENETIC DISTOGRAMS
- (2012) Olivier J. Hardy et al. EVOLUTION
- IS YOUR PHYLOGENY INFORMATIVE? MEASURING THE POWER OF COMPARATIVE METHODS
- (2012) Carl Boettiger et al. EVOLUTION
- Discriminating the effects of phylogenetic hypothesis, tree resolution and clade age estimates on phylogenetic signal measurements
- (2012) G. D. S. Seger et al. PLANT BIOLOGY
- EXPLORING PATTERNS OF INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION IN QUANTITATIVE TRAITS USING SEQUENTIAL PHYLOGENETIC EIGENVECTOR REGRESSIONS
- (2011) José Alexandre Felizola Diniz Filho et al. EVOLUTION
- Branch Lengths on Birth–Death Trees and the Expected Loss of Phylogenetic Diversity
- (2011) Arne Mooers et al. SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY
- Selectivity in Mammalian Extinction Risk and Threat Types: a New Measure of Phylogenetic Signal Strength in Binary Traits
- (2010) SUSANNE A. FRITZ et al. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
- A framework for metacommunity analysis of phylogenetic structure
- (2010) Valério D. Pillar et al. ECOLOGY LETTERS
- EARLY BURSTS OF BODY SIZE AND SHAPE EVOLUTION ARE RARE IN COMPARATIVE DATA
- (2010) Luke J Harmon et al. EVOLUTION
- POOR STATISTICAL PERFORMANCE OF THE MANTEL TEST IN PHYLOGENETIC COMPARATIVE ANALYSES
- (2010) Luke J. Harmon et al. EVOLUTION
- Phylogenetic comparative approaches for studying niche conservatism
- (2010) N. COOPER et al. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
- Comparison of the Mantel test and alternative approaches for detecting complex multivariate relationships in the spatial analysis of genetic data
- (2010) PIERRE LEGENDRE et al. Molecular Ecology Resources
- Conservatism and diversification of plant functional traits: Evolutionary rates versus phylogenetic signal
- (2009) D. Ackerly PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species
- (2008) Jonathan B. Losos ECOLOGY LETTERS
- Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate
- (2008) Liam J. Revell et al. SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started