4.5 Article

Common-possible concept analysis: A granule description viewpoint

Journal

APPLIED INTELLIGENCE
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 2975-2986

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-021-02499-9

Keywords

Concept analysis; Formal concept; Property oriented concept; Three-way concept; Granule description

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61772021, 11801440, 61976244]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi [2021JM-141]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province [NSFRF210318]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new method of common-possible concept analysis is proposed in this paper, which can effectively describe the common attributes and possible attributes of granules, addressing the shortcomings of existing types of concepts in this aspect. Experimental results show that this method can effectively deal with a type of problems and provide granule details different from that of formal concepts and property-oriented concepts.
Concepts are basic units of human cognitive activities and concept based granule description is one of the possible ways to realize explainable AI through information granules. However, the existing types of concepts cannot work effectively when it is necessary to simultaneously investigate the common attributes and possible attributes of granules. In order to solve this problem, we propose common-possible concept analysis based on a granule description viewpoint. Concretely, common-possible concepts are proposed, which can concurrently describe the common attributes and possible attributes of granules. Then, a method to acquire common-possible concepts from formal contexts is described. Besides, the connections between common-possible concepts and the other types of concepts are explored. Analysis results show that common-possible concept analysis can effectively deal with a type of problems and provides some details of granules different from that of formal concepts and property oriented concepts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available