4.8 Article

Cost-effective fast-synthesis of chabazite zeolites for the reduction of NOx

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 292, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120163

Keywords

CHA zeolites economization synthesis; Inter-zeolite conversion; Nitrogen oxides; Selective catalytic reduction; deNO(x)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21872052, 21972044, 21976078, 21773106]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2016YFA0202804, 2016YFC0205900]
  3. National Engineering Laboratory for Mobile Source Emission Control Technology [NELMS2019A12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study successfully synthesized Cu-CHA zeolite catalysts with superior performance in NH3-SCR of NOx reaction through a low-cost method. Surface analysis and infrared spectroscopy revealed the reaction mechanism, providing a new approach for the economic production of deNO(x) catalysts.
The costly synthesis of conventional CHA zeolites for ammonia selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides (NH3-SCR of NOx) has hindered their widespread applications. In this study, highly crystalline CHA zeolites (CHA-Y and CHA-B) were successfully synthesized from low-cost NaY and Al-rich beta precursors and alternately low cost or low content structure directing agents through the inter-zeolite conversion route. After ion exchange with Cu, the Cu-CHA-Y and Cu-CHA-B showed superior performance in the NH3-SCR of NOx reaction, which can be attributed to their high surface area, abundant acidic sites. The in situ analysis by diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) revealed the reaction intermediates of NH3-SCR of NOx over the low-cost prepared Cu-CHA catalysts. The as-prepared low-cost Cu-CHA catalysts are promising candidates for the reduction of NOx conforming to the economic production of deNO(x) catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available