4.7 Article

Classification of broiler behaviours using triaxial accelerometer and machine learning

Journal

ANIMAL
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100269

Keywords

Behaviour recognition; Poultry; Sliding window; Supervised learning; Wearable sensor

Funding

  1. Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research (FFAR) SMART Broiler Initiative
  2. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station (MAFES) Special Research Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding broiler behaviours through wearable accelerometers and machine learning models can effectively classify specific behaviors, with varying performances of different models. A window length of 1 second yields the best performance for classifying continuous broiler behaviors.
Understanding broiler behaviours provides important implications for animal well-being and farm man-agement. The objectives of this study were to classify specific broiler behaviours by analysing data from wearable accelerometers using two machine learning models, K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Lightweight triaxial accelerometers were used to record accelerations of nine 7-week-old broilers at a sampling frequency of 40 Hz. A total of 261.6-min data were labelled for four behaviours - walking, resting, feeding and drinking. Instantaneous motion features including magnitude area, vector magnitude, movement variation, energy, and entropy were extracted and stored in a dataset which was then segmented by one of the six window lengths (1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 20 s) with 50% overlap between consecutive windows. The mean, variation, SD, minimum and maximum of each instantaneous motion feature and two-way correlations of acceleration data were calculated within each window, yielding a total of 43 statistic features for training and testing of machine learning models. Performance of the models was evaluated using pure behaviour datasets (single behaviour type per data-set) and continuous behaviour datasets (continuous recording that involved multiple behaviour types per dataset). For pure behaviour datasets, both KNN and SVM models showed high sensitivities in classifying broiler resting (87% and 85%, respectively) and walking (99% and 99%, respectively). The accuracies of SVM were higher than KNN in differentiating feeding (88% and 75%, respectively) and drinking (83% and 62%, respectively) behaviours. Sliding window with 1-s length yielded the best performance for clas-sifying continuous behaviour datasets. The performance of classification model generally improved as more birds were included for training. In conclusion, classification of specific broiler behaviours can be achieved by recording bird triaxial accelerations and analysing acceleration data through machine learn-ing. Performances of different machine learning models differ in classifying specific broiler behaviours. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Animal Consortium. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available