4.8 Article

Holistic View on Materials Development: Water Electrolysis as a Case Study

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 60, Issue 37, Pages 20094-20100

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202105324

Keywords

catalysis; circular economy; OER; sustainability

Funding

  1. Fraunhofer Internal Programs [Attract 170-600006]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) within the Collaborative Research Centre/Transregio 247 Heterogeneous Oxidation Catalysis in the Liquid Phase [388390466-TRR 247]
  3. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the increasing ecological awareness, materials development focuses on improving performance and efficiency, considering aspects such as environmental impact, economic constraints, and technical feasibility. Promoting the incorporation of sustainability criteria in the design process can lead to products meeting circular economy requirements more effectively. Holistic evaluation based on experimental data modeling, as demonstrated with catalysts for water electrolysis, can provide a comprehensive approach to assess processes.
In view of rising ecological awareness, materials development is primarily aimed at improving the performance and efficiency of innovative and more elaborate materials. However, a materials performance figure of merit should include essential aspects of materials: environmental impact, economic constraints, technical feasibility, etc. Thus, we promote the inclusion of sustainability criteria already during the materials design process. With such a holistic design approach, new products may be more likely to meet the circular economy requirements than when traditional development strategies are pursued. Using catalysts for water electrolysis as an example, we present a modelling method based on experimental data to holistically evaluate processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available