4.7 Article

Electromembrane extraction of peptides using deep eutectic solvents as liquid membrane

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 1175, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338717

Keywords

Sample preparation; Electromembrane extraction; Peptides; Deep eutectic solvents

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway [286555]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports the first use of deep eutectic solvent as supported liquid membrane for peptide electromembrane extraction. By adding an ionic carrier, the extraction efficiency was improved, with the most efficient solvent achieving extraction recovery rates ranging from 55% to 83%. These results are higher than previously reported in the literature for the same model peptides.
For the first time, we report electromembrane extraction (EME) of peptides using deep eutectic solvent (DES) as supported liquid membrane ( SLM). DES were mixtures of coumarin, camphor, DL-menthol and thymol. Sixteen model peptides were extracted from 100 mu L 50 mM phosphate buffer solution (pH 3.0), through the SLM, and into 100 mu L acceptor solution consisting of 50 mM phosphoric acid (pH 1.8). EME was performed in 96-well format with 30 V to facilitate extraction of positively charged peptides. The model peptides comprised three to 13 amino acids, and differed significantly in terms of acid/base functionalities and polarity. We found pure DES to be inefficient for EME of peptides. However, with addition of a small amount of the ionic carrier di(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (DEHP) to the DES, the extraction efficiency increased due to ionic interactions. With the most efficient SLM; coumarin and thymol mixed in molar ratio (1:2) with 2.0% (v/v) DEHP, average recovery after 15 min was 55%; five peptides were extracted with recovery > 80%, nine peptides with recoveries in the range 40-80%, and two peptides were not extracted (recovery < 5%). When extraction time was extended to 45 min, average extraction recovery increased to 83%. Extraction recoveries with DES were higher than previously reported in the literature for the same model peptides. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available