Predictors of recruitment and retention in randomized controlled trials of behavioural smoking cessation interventions: a systematic review and meta‐regression analysis
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Predictors of recruitment and retention in randomized controlled trials of behavioural smoking cessation interventions: a systematic review and meta‐regression analysis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
ADDICTION
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2021-06-23
DOI
10.1111/add.15614
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Behaviour change techniques associated with smoking cessation in intervention and comparator groups of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta‐regression
- (2020) Nicola Black et al. ADDICTION
- Comparison of randomized controlled trials discontinued or revised for poor recruitment and completed trials with the same research question: a matched qualitative study
- (2019) Matthias Briel et al. Trials
- Development of a framework to improve the process of recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the SEAR (Screened, Eligible, Approached, Randomised) framework
- (2018) Caroline Wilson et al. Trials
- Treatment attrition: Associations with negative affect smoking motives and barriers to quitting among treatment-seeking smokers
- (2016) Lorra Garey et al. ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
- Attrition analysed in five waves of a longitudinal yearly survey of smokers: findings from the ITC Netherlands survey
- (2016) Dennis Zethof et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- A new simple six-step model to promote recruitment to RCTs was developed and successfully implemented
- (2016) Alba Realpe et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Factors associated with study attrition in a pilot randomised controlled trial to explore the role of exercise-assisted reduction to stop (EARS) smoking in disadvantaged groups
- (2016) T. P. Thompson et al. Trials
- Understanding recruitment and retention in the NHS community pharmacy stop smoking service: perceptions of smoking cessation advisers
- (2016) Ratna Sohanpal et al. BMJ Open
- Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage
- (2015) Wolfgang Viechtbauer Journal of Statistical Software
- Retention of Homeless Smokers in the Power to Quit Study
- (2014) Christina M. Richards et al. NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH
- The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
- (2014) Catrin Tudur Smith et al. Trials
- Recruitment and retention rates in behavioral trials involving patients and a support person: A systematic review
- (2013) Ranak B. Trivedi et al. Contemporary Clinical Trials
- A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies
- (2013) Ben G O Sully et al. Trials
- Differential dropout and bias in randomised controlled trials: when it matters and when it may not
- (2013) M. L. Bell et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Psychosocial Determinants of Attrition in a Longitudinal Study of Tobacco Use in Youth
- (2012) Ann Post et al. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
- Participant- and Study-Related Characteristics Predicting Treatment Completion and Study Retention in an Adolescent Smoking Cessation Trial
- (2011) Susan Kalkhuis-Beam et al. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH
- Design, recruitment, and retention of African-American smokers in a pharmacokinetic study
- (2010) Babalola Faseru et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Strategies for Increasing Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials: Systematic Review
- (2010) Patrina H. Y. Caldwell et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Why is recruitment to trials difficult? An investigation into recruitment difficulties in an RCT of supported employment in patients with severe mental illness
- (2008) Louise Howard et al. Contemporary Clinical Trials
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started