4.6 Article

Postquantum common-cause channels: the resource theory of local operations and shared entanglement

Journal

QUANTUM
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

VEREIN FORDERUNG OPEN ACCESS PUBLIZIERENS QUANTENWISSENSCHAF
DOI: 10.22331/q-2021-03-23-419

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship
  2. Government of Canada through the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
  3. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Colleges and Universities
  4. FQXi large grant The Emergence of Agents from Causal Order
  5. John Templeton Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The passage introduces a type-independent resource theory to quantify postquantumness, studying the conversions between different types of resources and their advantages in distributed tasks within the framework.
We define the type-independent resource theory of local operations and shared entanglement (LOSE). This allows us to formally quantify postquantumness in common-cause scenarios such as the Bell scenario. Any nonsignaling bipartite quantum channel which cannot be generated by LOSE operations requires a postquantum common cause to generate, and constitutes a valuable resource. Our framework allows LOSE operations that arbitrarily transform between different types of resources, which in turn allows us to undertake a systematic study of the different manifestations of postquantum common causes. Only three of these have been previously recognized, namely postquantum correlations, postquantum steering, and 'non-localizable' channels, all of which are subsumed as special cases of resources in our framework. Finally, we prove several fundamental results regarding how the type of a resource determines what conversions into other resources are possible, and also places constraints on the resource's ability to provide an advantage in distributed tasks such as nonlocal games, semiquantum games, steering games, etc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available