4.7 Article

Tris(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) Phosphate as a Cosolvent for a Nonflammable Electrolyte in Lithium-Ion Batteries

Journal

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 4919-4927

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.1c00503

Keywords

lithium-ion batteries; nonflammable organophosphorus; flame retardants; safe electrolyte; SEI film

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21878186]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a novel nonflammable electrolyte by mixing Tris(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) phosphate with gamma-butyrolactone for the first time. The electrolyte shows higher safety level, better wettability, and improved electrochemical performance when compared to a commercial electrolyte. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements are conducted to analyze the relationship between electrolyte compositions and electrochemical performance.
Tris(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) phosphate, as a flame-retarding cosolvent, is initially mixed with gamma-butyrolactone for the first time to formulate a nonflammable electrolyte, in which lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate is added as a film-forming additive. This electrolyte possesses a higher safety level and better wettability compared with a commercial electrolyte. The conductivity of this electrolyte is 7.40 mS cm(-1) at room temperature. This high-safety electrolyte helps graphite/LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 full cells to obtain good electrochemical performance. The capacity retention after 200 cycles at room temperature (1C) is 90.8% and the capacity retention of 100 cycles at 60 degrees C (1C) is up to 86.7%, which are better than those of the commercial electrolyte. To further analyze the relationships between compositions of electrolytes and the electrochemical performance of the full cells, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements are performed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available