4.7 Article

Celastrol and Triptolide Suppress Stemness in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Notch as a Therapeutic Target for Stem Cells

Journal

BIOMEDICINES
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9050482

Keywords

mammospheres; DCLK1; ALDH1; gamma-secretase; presenilin; nicastrin

Funding

  1. Department of Defense [W81XWH-18-1-0031, W81XWH-18-1-0032]
  2. Kansas Bioscience Authority
  3. Tom O'Sullivan Foundation
  4. National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant [P30CA168524]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that natural compounds celastrol and triptolide can inhibit cancer stem cells in TNBC and impact the Notch signaling pathway, potentially slowing down tumor progression.
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is observed in similar to 15% of breast cancers and results in poor survival and increased distant metastases. Within the tumor are present a small portion of cancer stem cells that drive tumorigenesis and metastasis. In this study, we aimed to elucidate whether the two natural compounds, celastrol and triptolide, inhibit stemness in TNBC. MDA-MB-231, BT20, and a patient-derived primary cells (PD-TNBC) were used in the study. Mammosphere assay was performed to assess the stemness. Both celastrol and triptolide treatment suppressed mammosphere formation. Furthermore, the compound suppressed expression of cancer stem cell marker proteins DCLK1, ALDH1, and CD133. Notch signaling plays a critical role in stem cells renewal. Both celastrol or triptolide reduced Notch -1 activation and expression of its downstream target proteins HES-1 and HEY-1. However, when NICD 1 was ectopically overexpressed in the cells, it partially rescued proliferation and mammosphere formation of the cells, supporting the role of notch signaling. Together, these data demonstrate that targeting stem cells and the notch signaling pathway may be an effective strategy for curtailing TNBC progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available