4.6 Article

T-DM1 versus pertuzumab, trastuzumab and a taxane as first-line therapy of early-relapsed HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: an Italian multicenter observational study

Journal

ESMO OPEN
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100099

Keywords

T-DM1; pertuzumab; trastuzumab; breast cancer; HER2; first-line

Categories

Funding

  1. Italian Government grant Programma di Ricerca Scientifica di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale (PRIN) 2017 [2017EKMFTN_006]
  2. ESMO Fellowship
  3. Istituto Oncologico Veneto projects [L04P11, L03P07, L05P07]
  4. DOR from the University of PadovadDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology BIRD 2019
  5. DOR from the University of PadovadDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology BIRD 2020

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that P+ T+ taxane is superior to T-DM1 as initial treatment for early-relapsing HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, showing better progression-free survival and overall survival.
Background: The current standard first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (+) metastatic breast cancer is the combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab and a taxane (P+ T+ taxane), while standard second-line is ado-trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1). The registration trial of pertuzumab, however, did not include early-relapsing patients, defined as patients experiencing tumor relapse <= 12 months from the end of (neo)adjuvant antiHER2 therapy. Conversely, the pivotal trial of T-DM1 included some patients relapsing <= 6 months after the end of (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab. Thus, a proportion of early-relapsing patients are currently eligible to receive T-DM1 as first-line treatment. Nevertheless, no direct comparison exists between the two regimens in this clinical setting. Patients and methods: We retrospectively compared T-DM1 versus P+ T+ taxane as first-line treatment in two cohorts of early-relapsing patients in an Italian 'real-world' setting, involving 14 public health care institutions. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included patients' characterization, overall survival and post-progression survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. All tests were two-sided and a P <= 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Among 1252 screened patients, 75 met the inclusion criteria. Forty-four (58.7%) received P+ T+ taxane and 31 (41.3%) received T-DM1. The two cohorts showed similar characteristics of aggressiveness and no significant differences in treatment history. T-DM1, compared with P+ T+ taxane was associated with worse progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-4.52, P = 0.021) and overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.95, 95% confidence interval: 1.38-11.32, P = 0.010), irrespective of previous (neo)adjuvant treatment, age, hormone receptors status, time-to-relapse (<= 6 months or within 6-12 months) and presence of visceral/brain metastases. No differences were observed in post-progression survival (P = 0.095). Conclusions: Our study suggests superiority for P+ T+ taxane over T-DM1 as up-front treatment of early-relapsing HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, which merits further assessment in larger and prospective trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available