4.6 Review

Ti(3)C(2)Tx MXene compounds for electrochemical energy storage

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100764

Keywords

MXene; Ti3C2; Energy storage; Secondary batteries; 2D materials; Titanium carbide

Funding

  1. Ministry of University and Research (MIUR)
  2. Ministry of University and Research (MIUR) through grant PRIN
  3. Research Fund for the Italian Electrical System in compliance with the Decree of Minister of Economic Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MXene compounds, especially Ti3C2-based phases, have attracted increasing interest from researchers since their discovery in 2011, resulting in over 2000 scientific works by 2020. Their unique properties make MXenes ideal for applications in energy storage, such as active materials in batteries and supercapacitors, as well as electrocatalytic materials. This study focuses on 5 recent articles (2019/2020) summarizing the potential of MXenes in different energy storage applications and the most promising preparation routes for industrial scalability.
Since their discovery in 2011, MXene compounds, and in particular the Ti3C2-based phases, have gained increasing interest from researchers leading to over 2000 scientific works in 2020. The peculiar morphological, charge transport, and surface properties make the MXenes ideal materials for energy storage applications such as active material in alkaline ion batteries and supercapacitors, as conductive or buffer agent in composite electrodes for high energy applications, and as electrocatalytic materials for oxygen evolution or redox flow batteries. Among this almost endless literature, this work fo-cuses on 5 recent articles (2019/2020) that summarize the potential of MXenes in different energy storage applications, also resuming the most promising preparatory routes regarding industrial scalability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available