Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool

(2016) Fiona J. Gilbert et al.   CLINICAL RADIOLOGY

Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening

(2016) Kathleen R. Brandt et al.   RADIOLOGY

Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography

(2016) Elizabeth S. McDonald et al.   JAMA Oncology

Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography

(2015) T.M. Svahn et al.   BREAST

Comparison of cumulative false-positive risk of screening mammography in the United States and Denmark

(2015) Katja Kemp Jacobsen et al.   Cancer Epidemiology

Impact of screening on clinicopathological features and treatment for invasive breast cancer: Results of two national surveys

(2015) B. Cutuli et al.   Cancer Radiotherapie

Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women’s information

(2015) Ritse M. Mann et al.   EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY

Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study

(2015) Kristina Lång et al.   EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY

Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: data and implications for population screening

(2015) Nehmat Houssami   Expert Review of Medical Devices

Comparing sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography in the United States and Denmark

(2015) Katja Kemp Jacobsen et al.   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER

Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk

(2015) Kevin C. Oeffinger et al.   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

Breast-Cancer Screening — Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group

(2015) Béatrice Lauby-Secretan et al.   NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

Mammographic Breast Density: Impact on Breast Cancer Risk and Implications for Screening

(2015) Phoebe E. Freer   RADIOGRAPHICS

Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173 797 patients

(2015) Sepideh Saadatmand et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173 797 patients

(2015) Sepideh Saadatmand et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Mammographic density is not a worthwhile examination to distinguish high cancer risk women in screening

(2014) Catherine Colin et al.   EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY

Efficiency of a Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology to Detect Patients with Extensive Axillary Lymph Node Involvement

(2014) Isabella Castellano et al.   PLoS One

Is Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis Also Nested in Pathologic Misclassification?

(2014) Catherine Colin et al.   RADIOLOGY

Two-View Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening with Synthetically Reconstructed Projection Images: Comparison with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Full-Field Digital Mammographic Images

(2014) Per Skaane et al.   RADIOLOGY

The risk of radiation-induced breast cancers due to biennial mammographic screening in women aged 50–69 years is minimal

(2013) Ingrid Helen Ryste Hauge et al.   ACTA RADIOLOGICA

Trends in breast biopsies for abnormalities detected at screening mammography: a population-based study in the Netherlands

(2013) V van Breest Smallenburg et al.   BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER

Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration

(2013) Per Skaane et al.   EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY

Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study

(2013) Stefano Ciatto et al.   LANCET ONCOLOGY

Comparison of Digital Mammography Alone and Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in a Population-based Screening Program

(2013) Per Skaane et al.   RADIOLOGY

Summary of the Evidence of Breast Cancer Service Screening Outcomes in Europe and First Estimate of the Benefit and Harm Balance Sheet

(2012) Eugenio Paci   JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING

Dose Reduction in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Screening using Synthetically Reconstructed Projection Images

(2011) David Gur et al.   ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY

Prognosis and pathology of screen-detected carcinomas

(2010) Iris D. Nagtegaal et al.   CANCER

Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group

(2010) Francesco Sardanelli et al.   EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER

Can mammographic assessments lead to consider density as a risk factor for breast cancer?

(2010) C. Colin et al.   EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY

Risk of Radiation-induced Breast Cancer from Mammographic Screening

(2010) Martin J. Yaffe et al.   RADIOLOGY

Incidence and tumor characteristics of breast cancer diagnosed before and after implementation of a population-based screening-program

(2008) Solveig Hofvind et al.   ACTA ONCOLOGICA

Prognostic Role of Detection Method and Its Relationship with Tumor Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience

(2008) W. Dong et al.   CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION