4.7 Article

Model-based state of health estimation of a lead-acid battery using step-response and emulated in-situ vehicle data

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102353

Keywords

On-board diagnostic; Lead-acid battery; Capacity; Cranking capability; Aging

Categories

Funding

  1. Ford Motor Company, United States [OSUALJ060-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, an equivalent circuit model of a 12V lead-acid battery was developed and aging experiments were conducted to determine the state of health of the batteries. Additionally, a novel SOH estimation technique based on frequency response analysis was proposed.
Lead-acid (PbA) batteries are one the most prevalent battery chemistries in low voltage automotive applications. In this work, we have developed an equivalent circuit model (ECM) of a 12V PbA battery while preserving the major dynamics of a semi-empirical model we have developed previously. Thereafter, two batteries are aged according to a modified IEC 60095-1 standard and the evolution of ECM parameters investigated. The trend derived from these aging campaigns are used to determine the state of health (SOH) of three either new or aged on the vehicle batteries. The contribution from this approach stems from the fact that the ECM model while being simple is capable of approximating the sum of charge transfer resistances of both electrodes from a short step response. In addition, another SOH estimation technique is developed based on frequency response analysis of a metric dubbed instantaneous dynamic resistance derived from voltage response of the battery during engine cranking. Real world voltage response of the battery during cranking is imitated in the lab and superposed on IEC 60095-1 standard profile, according to which another battery is aged. This data is used to assess the performance of SOH estimation technique.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available