4.5 Review

Natural variability in the disease course of SSc-ILD: implications for treatment

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW
Volume 30, Issue 159, Pages -

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0340-2020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through longitudinal clinical trials and observational studies, researchers assessed definitions, progression patterns, risk factors, and implications for treatment of SSc-associated ILD. Approximately 20-30% of patients develop progressive ILD early in the disease course, with risk factors such as age, FVC, extent of fibrosis, and presence of anti-topoisomerase I antibodies contributing to predicting progression.
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) affects approximately 50% of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and is the leading cause of death in SSc. Our objective was to gain insight into the progression of SSc-associated ILD (SSc-ILD). Using data from longitudinal clinical trials and observational studies, we assessed definitions and patterns of progression, risk factors for progression, and implications for treatment. SSc-ILD progression was commonly defined as exceeding specific thresholds of lung function worsening and/or increasing radiographic involvement. One definition used in several studies is decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) of >= 10%, or >= 5-10% plus a decline in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide >= 15%. Based on these criteria, 20-30% of patients in observational cohorts develop progressive ILD, starting early in the disease course and progressing at a highly variable rate. Risk factors such as age, FVC, extent of fibrosis and presence of anti-topoisomerase I antibodies can help predict progression of SSc-ILD, though composite risk scores may offer greater predictive power. Whilst the variability of the disease course in SSc-ILD makes risk stratification of patients challenging, the decision to initiate, change or stop treatment should be based on a combination of the current disease state and the speed of progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available