4.6 Review

Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cervical Cancer: From Preclinical to Clinical Data

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092089

Keywords

cervical cancer; immunotherapy; immune checkpoint inhibitors; PD-1; PD-L1; CTLA4

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cervical cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality in women globally, and immunotherapy is being investigated as a potential treatment option for advanced, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. HPV infection is the primary cause of almost all cervical cancers, and immunotherapy may enhance treatment outcomes by restoring the immune response against tumors.
Simple Summary Cervical cancer represents one of the main leading causes of cancer-related mortality in women worldwide. In contrast to patients with early-stage disease, those with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer have a poor prognosis and new treatment strategies are needed. Immunotherapy has recently modified the natural course of different tumors, such as melanoma and lung cancer. The aim of this review is to evaluate the possible role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cervical cancer treatment. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the recognized cause of almost all cervical cancers. Despite the reduction in incidence due to a wide use of screening programs and a specific vaccine, the prognosis of cervical cancer remains poor, especially for late-stage and relapsed disease. Considering the elevated rates of PD-L1 expression in up to 80% of cervical cancers, a strong rationale supports the use of immunotherapy to restore the immune response against tumor. The aim of this review is to analyze the possible role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cervical cancer treatment, with a particular focus on the rationale and on the results of phase I and II clinical trials. An overview of ongoing phase III studies with possible future areas of development is also provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available