4.8 Review

Cues conditioned to withdrawal and negative reinforcement: Neglected but key motivational elements driving opioid addiction

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 7, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf0364

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Programs of the National Institute on Drug Abuse
  2. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
  3. National Institutes of Health [DA048530]
  4. National Science Foundation [DGE-1922598]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Environmental stimuli paired with withdrawal cues can promote motivation for opioids and lead to substance consumption. Patients with chronic pain may misuse opioids to escape pain. Sex differences may influence withdrawal-induced stress reactivity and withdrawal cue processing.
Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a debilitating disorder that affects millions of people. Neutral cues can acquire motivational properties when paired with the positive emotional effects of drug intoxication to stimulate relapse. However, much less research has been devoted to cues that become conditioned to the aversive effects of opioid withdrawal. We argue that environmental stimuli promote motivation for opioids when cues are paired with withdrawal (conditioned withdrawal) and generate opioid consumption to terminate conditioned withdrawal (conditioned negative reinforcement). We review evidence that cues associated with pain drive opioid consumption, as patients with chronic pain may misuse opioids to escape physical and emotional pain. We highlight sex differences in withdrawal-induced stress reactivity and withdrawal cue processing and discuss neurocircuitry that may underlie withdrawal cue processing in dependent individuals. These studies highlight the importance of studying cues associated with withdrawal in dependent individuals and point to areas for exploration in OUD research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available