4.6 Article

Performance Evaluation of RNN with Hyperbolic Secant in Gate Structure through Application of Parkinson's Disease Detection

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11104361

Keywords

recurrent neural network (RNN); hyperbolic secant (sech) function; recurrence plot; Parkinson's disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates a novel RNN model with sech gate and RP images for PD detection task, which shows competitive performance in accuracy and learning speed compared to traditional models. Future work will focus on further improving detection performance by analyzing input sound types, RP image sizes, and deep learning structures.
This paper studies a novel recurrent neural network (RNN) with hyperbolic secant (sech) in the gate for a specific medical application task of Parkinson's disease (PD) detection. In detail, it focuses on the fact that patients with PD have motor speech disorders, by converting the voice data into black-and-white images of a recurrence plot (RP) at specific time intervals and constructing the detection model that combines RNN and convolutional neural network (CNN); the study evaluates the performance of the RNN with sech gate compared with long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) with conventional gates. As a result, the proposed model obtained similar results to LSTM and GRU (an average accuracy of about 70%) with less hyperparameters, resulting in faster learning. In addition, in the framework of the RNN with sech in gate, the accuracy obtained by using tanh as the output activation function is higher than using the relu function. The proposed method will see more improvement by increasing the data in the future. More analysis on the input sound type, the RP image size, and the deep learning structures will be included in our future work for further improving the performance of PD detection from voice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available