4.6 Article

Representativeness in Geographical Indications: A Comparison between the State-Driven and Producer-Driven Systems in Vietnam and France

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13095056

Keywords

geographical indications; representativeness; collective dynamics; legal frameworks; producers’ groups; state-driven; producer-driven; specifications; Vietnam; France

Funding

  1. London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)
  2. UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper explores issues of representativeness and participation in the processes of elaborating geographical indications (GI) specifications and governance of GI initiatives, comparing the producer-led approach in France with the state-driven approach in Vietnam through six case studies. Different understandings and implementations of representativeness are shaped by legal frameworks, with negotiations among stakeholders in France and a consultative role for local stakeholders under state authority in Vietnam. Opportunities for fairness and empowerment vary between the two approaches.
This paper explores the issues of representativeness and participation in the collective processes involved in the elaboration of the geographical indications (GI) specifications and the governance of the GI initiatives. The objective is to understand the relationship among collective dynamics, representativeness of relevant stakeholders, and the legal frameworks for the protection of GIs. Using a qualitative methodology based on an analysis of six case studies in France and Vietnam, we show the role of the law in shaping the different ways of understanding and implementing the concept of representativeness in the French producer-led and the Vietnamese state-driven approaches to GI protection. In France, the GI specifications result from negotiations among all legitimate stakeholders, which may prove long, complex, and lead to standards that can continue to be challenged after the GI registration. We also argue that the rules for the representation of all GI users in the decision-making processes do not necessarily lead to fairness. In Vietnam, local stakeholders usually have a consultative role under the authority of the State, resulting in their little understanding and low use of the GI. Their empowerment is further hindered by the involvement of state authorities in the management of the producers' associations. We conclude by discussing in-between solutions to promote the producers' representation and participation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available