4.4 Article

Black hole perturbations of massive and partially massless spin-2 fields in (anti) de Sitter spacetime

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2021)139

Keywords

Black Holes; Field Theories in Higher Dimensions

Funding

  1. DOE [DE-SC0011941]
  2. Simons Foundation [555117]
  3. National Science Foundation [NSF PHY-1748958]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper systematically and comprehensively derives the linearized dynamics of massive and partially massless spin-2 particles in a Schwarzschild (anti) de Sitter black hole background in four and higher spacetime dimensions. It examines the isospectrality between modes of different parity for partially massless fields in Schwarzschild de Sitter spacetime, proving analytically the isospectrality for modes with multipole number L = 1 in four spacetime dimensions and showing that isospectrality between partially massless modes of different parity is broken in higher-dimensional Schwarzschild de Sitter spacetimes.
We provide a systematic and comprehensive derivation of the linearized dynamics of massive and partially massless spin-2 particles in a Schwarzschild (anti) de Sitter black hole background, in four and higher spacetime dimensions. In particular, we show how to obtain the quadratic actions for the propagating modes and recast the resulting equations of motion in a Schrodinger-like form. In the case of partially massless fields in Schwarzschild de Sitter spacetime, we study the isospectrality between modes of different parity. In particular, we prove isospectrality analytically for modes with multipole number L = 1 in four spacetime dimensions, providing the explicit form of the underlying symmetry. We show that isospectrality between partially massless modes of different parity is broken in higher-dimensional Schwarzschild de Sitter spacetimes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available