4.8 Review

FRET-based dynamic structural biology: Challenges, perspectives and an appeal for open-science practices

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.60416

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM130942, GM095904, GM079238, GM098859, GM084288, GM137608, GM112882, GM123164, GM130793, GM140272, GM130375, 128185]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  3. National Science Foundation [1818147, 1842951, 2004016]
  4. Human Frontier Science Program [RGP0061/2019]
  5. European Research Council [638536, 860954, SMPFv2.0, 671208, 819299]
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [GRK2062, SFB863, PL696/4-1, SPP2191 402723784, SFB 1129 240245660, SE 1195/21-1 (SPP 2191), SFB1035]
  7. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CIBSS [EXC-2189, 390939984]
  8. Wellcome Trust [110164/Z/15/Z]
  9. Swiss National Science Foundation
  10. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/S008896/1, BB/T008032/1]
  11. Royal Society [RGS\R2\180405, DKR00620, RGF\R1\180054]
  12. Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-17-CE09-0026-02]
  13. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-18-CE11-0004-02, ANR-19-CE44-0009-02]
  14. Israel Science Foundation [1250/19, 3565/20]
  15. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1A2C2090896, NRF-2019R1A2C2005209, NRF-2019R1A2C1089808]
  16. Independent Fund Denmark [6110-00623B]
  17. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0507700]
  18. UHasselt BOF fund [R-10789]
  19. Milner Fund
  20. KU Leuven Special Research Fund [C14/16/053]
  21. Carlsbergfondet [CF16-0797]
  22. Villum Fonden [18333]
  23. Novo Nordisk [NNF14CC0001]
  24. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen
  25. Carolina Cancer Center of Nanotechnology Excellence
  26. University of Melbourne
  27. Searle Scholars Program
  28. University of Zurich
  29. EPSRC
  30. Direct For Biological Sciences [1842951] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  31. Division Of Chemistry
  32. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [2004016] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  33. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1842951] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  34. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  35. Direct For Biological Sciences [1818147] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  36. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-18-CE11-0004] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  37. BBSRC [BB/S008896/1, BB/T008032/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  38. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [860954] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  39. National Research Foundation of Korea [4199990114533] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  40. European Research Council (ERC) [671208, 638536, 819299] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Single-molecule FRET (smFRET) has become a mainstream technique for studying biomolecular structural dynamics, with significant progress being made in sample preparation, measurement procedures, data analysis, algorithms, and documentation. Efforts have been made to streamline experiments and analyze results for obtaining quantitative information. Open science practices are strongly encouraged for further progress in this field.
Single-molecule FRET (smFRET) has become a mainstream technique for studying biomolecular structural dynamics. The rapid and wide adoption of smFRET experiments by an ever-increasing number of groups has generated significant progress in sample preparation, measurement procedures, data analysis, algorithms and documentation. Several labs that employ smFRET approaches have joined forces to inform the smFRET community about streamlining how to perform experiments and analyze results for obtaining quantitative information on biomolecular structure and dynamics. The recent efforts include blind tests to assess the accuracy and the precision of smFRET experiments among different labs using various procedures. These multi-lab studies have led to the development of smFRET procedures and documentation, which are important when submitting entries into the archiving system for integrative structure models, PDB-Dev. This position paper describes the current 'state of the art' from different perspectives, points to unresolved methodological issues for quantitative structural studies, provides a set of 'soft recommendations' about which an emerging consensus exists, and lists openly available resources for newcomers and seasoned practitioners. To make further progress, we strongly encourage 'open science' practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available