4.6 Article

On the Evolution of Different Types of Green Water Events

Journal

WATER
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13091148

Keywords

green water events; multiple surfaces; wave trains; image analysis; wave flume; volumes; challenges; freeboard exceedance; plunging-dam-break; hammer-fist

Funding

  1. CONACYT-SENER-Sustentabilidad Energetica, CEMIEOceano project [FSE-2014-06-249795]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the evolution of green water events, analyzing the characteristics of different types of green water events and the effect of wave steepness on the duration, maximum freeboard exceedance, and volumes of the events. The results demonstrate that different types of green water events exhibit distinct features in the early stage of interaction with the deck.
Green water events may present different features in the initial stage of interaction with the deck of a structure. It is therefore important to investigate the evolution of different types of green water, since not all the events interact with the deck at the same time. In this paper, the evolution of three types of green water events (dam-break, plunging-dam-break, and hammer-fist) are studied. The water surface elevations and volumes over the deck in consecutive green water events, generated by incident [wave trains in a wave flume, were analyzed using image-based methods. The results show multiple-valued water surface elevations in the early stage of plunging-dam-break and hammer-fist type events. Detailed experimental measurements of this stage are shown for the first time. The effect of wave steepness on the duration of the events, maximum freeboard exceedance, and volumes were also investigated. Although the hammer-fist type showed high freeboard exceedances, the plunging-dam-break type presented the largest volumes over the deck. Some challenges for further assessments of green water propagation are reported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available