4.2 Article

Escalation Therapy of Steroid Refractory Multiple Sclerosis Relapse with Tryptophan Immunoadsorption - Observational Multicenter Study with 147 Patients

Journal

EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 5-6, Pages 300-306

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000447059

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis; Steroid-refractory relapse; Escalation therapy; Tryptophan immunoadsorption; Plasma exchange

Funding

  1. Bayer vital
  2. Biogen
  3. DIAMED
  4. Genzyme
  5. Novartis
  6. Pfizer
  7. Teva
  8. Merck Serono
  9. ASAHI Kasei Medical
  10. Ipsen
  11. Merz
  12. Merck-Serono

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A marked proportion of multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses is followed by incomplete recovery. Our aim was to considerably increase the evidence of the clinical use of immunoadsorption (IA) as escalation therapy for patients with MS relapse. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was performed in MS patients with steroid refractory relapse who were treated with tryptophan IA. The main outcome parameter was change of acute relapse-related disability assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and visual acuity (VA) measurements for patients with optic neuritis (ON). IA treatments were performed using single-use tryptophan adsorbers. Results: Data of 147 MS patients and 786 single IA treatments were analyzed. Treatment with IA was commenced in mean 32 +/- 35 days after the onset of relapse. One hundred and five out of 147 patients (71.4%) improved functionally after mean 5.4 IA treatments within 7-10 days. EDSS improved from median 5 (interquartile range, IQR 3.5) to 4 (IQR 2.5) (p < 0.001). In patients with ON (n = 32), VA improved after the IA series in 84% of cases from median 0.2 (IQR 0.6) to 0.6 (IQR 0.66) (p < 0.001). In 98.9% of IA treatments, no clinically relevant side effect was reported. Conclusion: Tryptophan IA was found to be effective and well tolerated as escalation therapy for MS relapse. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available