4.3 Article

Post-metamorphic skeletal growth in the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus and implications for body plan evolution

Journal

EVODEVO
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13227-021-00174-1

Keywords

Echinoid; Skeleton; Development

Funding

  1. Royal Society Newton International Fellowship
  2. Marie Curie ITN EvoCELL [766053]
  3. Assemble + Grant [ASke-420-III]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By studying the growth and development of sea urchin skeletons, we can understand the origins of animal diversity and the evolutionary process of body plans, providing a framework for understanding the diversity of animal body plans on Earth.
Background: Understanding the molecular and cellular processes that underpin animal development are crucial for understanding the diversity of body plans found on the planet today. Because of their abundance in the fossil record, and tractability as a model system in the lab, skeletons provide an ideal experimental model to understand the origins of animal diversity. We herein use molecular and cellular markers to understand the growth and development of the juvenile sea urchin (echinoid) skeleton. Results: We developed a detailed staging scheme based off of the first-4 weeks of post-metamorphic life of the regular echinoid Paracentrotus lividus. We paired this scheme with immunohistochemical staining for neuronal, muscular, and skeletal tissues, and fluorescent assays of skeletal growth and cell proliferation to understand the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying skeletal growth and development of the sea urchin body plan. Conclusions: Our experiments highlight the role of skeletogenic proteins in accretionary skeletal growth and cell proliferation in the addition of new metameric tissues. Furthermore, this work provides a framework for understanding the developmental evolution of sea urchin body plans on macroevolutionary timescales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available