4.1 Article

FUZZY MODELING IN ORANGE PRODUCTION UNDER DIFFERENT DOSES OF SEWAGE SLUDGE AND WASTEWATER

Journal

ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 204-214

Publisher

SOC BRASIL ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA
DOI: 10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n2p204-214/2021

Keywords

Fuzzy logic; organic matter; biosolid; reuse water; Mamdani method

Funding

  1. Minas Gerais State Agency for Research and Development for the scholarship grant [APQ-00498-16]
  2. Sao Paulo State University [408/2015]
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [303923/2018-0, 315228/2020-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to develop mathematical fuzzy models to evaluate the effects of different doses of sewage sludge and irrigation water on crop development. The results showed that the use of sewage sludge may potentially replace mineral nitrogen in the future.
The present work aimed to develop mathematical fuzzy models to evaluate the effects of different doses of sewage sludge and irrigation with wastewater and potable water. Such models were elaborated from an experiment carried out at the Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, in the Department of Soil and Environmental Resources, from the Sao Paulo State University, in Brazil. The experiment was carried out in a randomized block design, in a 6 x 2 factorial scheme, with 6 doses of sewage sludge (0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 125 of the recommended dose of N), and in the presence and absence of wastewater. In the development of the fuzzy model, the Mamdani method was used for the defuzzification. As input variables, the doses of sewage sludge and the types of water were used. For the output variables, it was sought to evaluate the biometric and developmental components of the culture. It can be inferred that the model developed presented a good fit when compared to the regression model, and that the use of sewage sludge may prove to be a potential future replacement of mineral nitrogen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available