4.6 Article

Methods and results used in the development of a consensus-driven extension to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement for trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (CONSORT-ROUTINE)

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049093

Keywords

statistics & research methods; general medicine (see internal medicine); clinical trials

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [PJT156172, PCS-161863]
  2. UK National Institute of Health Research (NIHR)
  3. Vanier CIHR Graduate Scholarship
  4. Wellcome Senior Clinical Fellowship in Science [205039/Z/16/Z]
  5. New Investigator Award from CIHR
  6. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and Crohn's and Colitis Canada
  7. Career Enhancement Program of the Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Program
  8. Canada Research Chairs Program [231397]
  9. UK Medical Research Council through a Clinician Scientist Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of CONSORT-ROUTINE involved a scoping review, a Delphi study, a consensus meeting, and publication. The final checklist includes new and modified items, aiming to improve the reporting quality of trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data.
Objectives Randomised controlled trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data, including registries, electronic health records and administrative databases, are increasingly used in healthcare intervention research. A Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement extension for trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (CONSORT-ROUTINE) has been developed with the goal of improving reporting quality. This article describes the processes and methods used to develop the extension and decisions made to arrive at the final checklist. Methods The development process involved five stages: (1) identification of the need for a reporting guideline and project launch; (2) conduct of a scoping review to identify possible modifications to CONSORT 2010 checklist items and possible new extension items; (3) a three-round modified Delphi study involving key stakeholders to gather feedback on the checklist; (4) a consensus meeting to finalise items to be included in the extension, followed by stakeholder piloting of the checklist; and (5) publication, dissemination and implementation of the final checklist. Results 27 items were initially developed and rated in Delphi round 1, 13 items were rated in round 2 and 11 items were rated in round 3. Response rates for the Delphi study were 92 of 125 (74%) invited participants in round 1, 77 of 92 (84%) round 1 completers in round 2 and 62 of 77 (81%) round 2 completers in round 3. Twenty-seven members of the project team representing a variety of stakeholder groups attended the in-person consensus meeting. The final checklist includes five new items and eight modified items. The extension Explanation & Elaboration document further clarifies aspects that are important to report. Conclusion Uptake of CONSORT-ROUTINE and accompanying Explanation & Elaboration document will improve conduct of trials, as well as the transparency and completeness of reporting of trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available