4.7 Article

Tumor apelin and obesity are associated with reduced neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in a cohort of breast cancer patients

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89385-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS FRFS-WELBIO) [WELBIO-CR-2019C-02R]
  2. Funds Baillet Latour (Grant for Medical Research 2015)
  3. 'Foundation Against Cancer' (Brussels, Belgium)
  4. FRS-FNSR, Belgium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Obesity is associated with increased risk of breast cancer and reduced response to chemotherapy, while high levels of apelin are linked to breast cancer progression. In a retrospective study of 62 breast cancer patients, obesity and high tumoral apelin expression were found to be independently associated with reduced response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These findings need to be validated in independent cohorts.
Obesity is a known factor increasing the risk of developing breast cancer and reducing disease free survival. In addition to these well-documented effects, recent studies have shown that obesity is also affecting response to chemotherapy. Among the multiple dysregulations associated with obesity, increased level of the apelin adipokine has been recently shown to be directly involved in the association between obesity and increased breast cancer progression. In this study, we analyzed in a retrospective cohort of 62 breast cancer patients the impact of obesity and tumoral apelin expression on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the multivariate logistic regression, obesity and high tumoral apelin expression were associated with a reduced response to NAC in our cohort. However, obesity and high tumoral apelin expression were not correlated, suggesting that those two parameters could be independently associated with reduced NAC response. These findings should be confirmed in independent cohorts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available