Comparison of structure- and ligand-based scoring functions for deep generative models: a GPCR case study
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Comparison of structure- and ligand-based scoring functions for deep generative models: a GPCR case study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Journal of Cheminformatics
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2021-05-13
DOI
10.1186/s13321-021-00516-0
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A Deep Learning Approach to Antibiotic Discovery
- (2020) Jonathan M. Stokes et al. CELL
- Assessing the impact of generative AI on medicinal chemistry
- (2020) W. Patrick Walters et al. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- De novo generation of hit-like molecules from gene expression signatures using artificial intelligence
- (2020) Oscar Méndez-Lucio et al. Nature Communications
- Impact of GPCR Structures on Drug Discovery
- (2020) Miles Congreve et al. CELL
- The Synthesizability of Molecules Proposed by Generative Models
- (2020) Wenhao Gao et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Combining Cloud-Based Free-Energy Calculations, Synthetically Aware Enumerations, and Goal-Directed Generative Machine Learning for Rapid Large-Scale Chemical Exploration and Optimization
- (2020) Phani Ghanakota et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Guidelines for Recurrent Neural Network Transfer Learning-Based Molecular Generation of Focused Libraries
- (2020) Silvia Amabilino et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Chemical space exploration based on recurrent neural networks: applications in discovering kinase inhibitors
- (2020) Xuanyi Li et al. Journal of Cheminformatics
- Can easy chemistry produce complex, diverse, and novel molecules?
- (2020) Anna Tomberg et al. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY
- ‘It will change everything’: DeepMind’s AI makes gigantic leap in solving protein structures
- (2020) Ewen Callaway NATURE
- Molecular Sets (MOSES): A Benchmarking Platform for Molecular Generation Models
- (2020) Daniil Polykovskiy et al. Frontiers in Pharmacology
- Molecular Design in Synthetically Accessible Chemical Space via Deep Reinforcement Learning
- (2020) Julien Horwood et al. ACS Omega
- Exploring the GDB-13 chemical space using deep generative models
- (2019) Josep Arús-Pous et al. Journal of Cheminformatics
- OPLS3e: Extending Force Field Coverage for Drug-Like Small Molecules
- (2019) Katarina Roos et al. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- GuacaMol: Benchmarking Models for de Novo Molecular Design
- (2019) Nathan Brown et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Deep Reinforcement Learning for Multiparameter Optimization in de novo Drug Design
- (2019) Niclas Ståhl et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Optimization of Molecules via Deep Reinforcement Learning
- (2019) Zhenpeng Zhou et al. Scientific Reports
- Deep learning enables rapid identification of potent DDR1 kinase inhibitors
- (2019) Alex Zhavoronkov et al. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- Has Drug Design Augmented by Artificial Intelligence Become a Reality?
- (2019) Hongming Chen et al. TRENDS IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- A de novo molecular generation method using latent vector based generative adversarial network
- (2019) Oleksii Prykhodko et al. Journal of Cheminformatics
- Most Ligand-Based Classification Benchmarks Reward Memorization Rather than Generalization
- (2018) Izhar Wallach et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Automatic Chemical Design Using a Data-Driven Continuous Representation of Molecules
- (2018) Rafael Gómez-Bombarelli et al. ACS Central Science
- Fréchet ChemNet Distance: A Metric for Generative Models for Molecules in Drug Discovery
- (2018) Kristina Preuer et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Structure of the D2 dopamine receptor bound to the atypical antipsychotic drug risperidone
- (2018) Sheng Wang et al. NATURE
- Deep reinforcement learning for de novo drug design
- (2018) Mariya Popova et al. Science Advances
- Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions: The CASF-2016 Update
- (2018) Minyi Su et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- ChEMBL: towards direct deposition of bioassay data
- (2018) David Mendez et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Trends in GPCR drug discovery: new agents, targets and indications
- (2017) Alexander S. Hauser et al. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY
- ExCAPE-DB: an integrated large scale dataset facilitating Big Data analysis in chemogenomics
- (2017) Jiangming Sun et al. Journal of Cheminformatics
- Molecular de-novo design through deep reinforcement learning
- (2017) Marcus Olivecrona et al. Journal of Cheminformatics
- Generating Focused Molecule Libraries for Drug Discovery with Recurrent Neural Networks
- (2017) Marwin H. S. Segler et al. ACS Central Science
- Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Dopamine D2Receptor Ligands as Potential Antipsychotics
- (2016) Agnieszka A. Kaczor et al. ChemMedChem
- Molecular interaction fingerprint approaches for GPCR drug discovery
- (2016) Márton Vass et al. CURRENT OPINION IN PHARMACOLOGY
- AutoQSAR: an automated machine learning tool for best-practice quantitative structure–activity relationship modeling
- (2016) Steven L Dixon et al. Future Medicinal Chemistry
- Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method
- (2016) Albert J. Kooistra et al. Scientific Reports
- Strong Nonadditivity as a Key Structure–Activity Relationship Feature: Distinguishing Structural Changes from Assay Artifacts
- (2015) Christian Kramer et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- ZINC 15 – Ligand Discovery for Everyone
- (2015) Teague Sterling et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Better Informed Distance Geometry: Using What We Know To Improve Conformation Generation
- (2015) Sereina Riniker et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Protein structure prediction provides comparable performance to crystallographic structures in docking-based virtual screening
- (2015) Hongying Du et al. METHODS
- Discovery, Optimization, and Characterization of Novel D2 Dopamine Receptor Selective Antagonists
- (2014) Jingbo Xiao et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
- Lessons Learned in Empirical Scoring with smina from the CSAR 2011 Benchmarking Exercise
- (2013) David Ryan Koes et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments
- (2013) G. Madhavi Sastry et al. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN
- Enumeration of 166 Billion Organic Small Molecules in the Chemical Universe Database GDB-17
- (2012) Lars Ruddigkeit et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Directory of Useful Decoys, Enhanced (DUD-E): Better Ligands and Decoys for Better Benchmarking
- (2012) Michael M. Mysinger et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
- Quantifying the chemical beauty of drugs
- (2012) G. Richard Bickerton et al. Nature Chemistry
- Improved Treatment of Ligands and Coupling Effects in Empirical Calculation and Rationalization of pKaValues
- (2011) Chresten R. Søndergaard et al. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Predicting the accuracy of protein-ligand docking on homology models
- (2010) Annalisa Bordogna et al. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
- New Substructure Filters for Removal of Pan Assay Interference Compounds (PAINS) from Screening Libraries and for Their Exclusion in Bioassays
- (2010) Jonathan B. Baell et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
- 970 Million Druglike Small Molecules for Virtual Screening in the Chemical Universe Database GDB-13
- (2009) Lorenz C. Blum et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
- Estimation of synthetic accessibility score of drug-like molecules based on molecular complexity and fragment contributions
- (2009) Peter Ertl et al. Journal of Cheminformatics
- Can we use docking and scoring for hit-to-lead optimization?
- (2008) Istvan J. Enyedy et al. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started