4.4 Article

Formulation of sublingual promethazine hydrochloride tablets for rapid relief of motion sickness

Journal

SAUDI PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 478-486

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2021.04.011

Keywords

Formulation; Promethazine hydrochloride; Sublingual; Tablet

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education [NU/MID/17/113]
  2. Deanship of Scientific Research, Najran University [NU/MID/17/113]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study successfully developed sublingual tablets of promethazine hydrochloride by optimizing the formulation for attributes such as hardness, disintegration time, and taste masking effect. The content of taste-masking agent and superdisintegrant had significant effects on tablet properties, leading to the successful preparation of ideal sublingual tablets through optimized formulation.
The delivery of antihistaminic agents via the oral route is problematic, especially for elderly patients. This study aimed to develop a sublingual formulation of promethazine hydrochloride by direct compression, and to mask its intensely bitter taste. Promethazine hydrochloride (PMZ) sublingual tablets prepared by direct compression were optimized using Box-Behnken full factorial design. The effect of a taste-masking agent (Eudragit E 100, X1), superdisintegrant (crospovidone; CPV, X2) and lubricant (sodium stearyl fumarate; SSF, X3) on sublingual tablets' attributes (responses, Y) was optimized. The prepared sublingual tablets were characterized for hardness (Y1), disintegration time (Y2), initial dissolution rate (IDR; Y3) and dissolution efficiency after 30 min (Dissolution Efficiency (DE); Y4). The obtained results showed a significant positive effect of the three independent factors on tablet hardness (P < 0.05), and the interactive effect of Eudragit E 100 and CPV on tablet hardness was significant. Disintegration time was mainly affected by Eudragit E 100 and CPV concentrations. Moreover, IDR was employed to assess the taste masking effect, lower values were obtained at higher Eudragit E 100 concentration despite it was statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). Optimized formulation that was suggested by the software was composed of: Eudragit E 100 (X1) = 2.5% w/w, CPV (X2) = 4.13% w/w, and SSF (X3) = 1.0% w/w. The observed values of the optimized formula were found to be close to the predicted optimized values. The Differential Scanning Calorimetric (DSC) studies indicated no interaction between PMZ and tablet excipients. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available