4.6 Article

Amazon wood species classification: a comparison between deep learning and pre-designed features

Journal

WOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 857-872

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00226-021-01282-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil) [301715/2018-1]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brazil (CAPES) [001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The wood industry is crucial in many countries, but illegal logging is a common issue for reducing costs and obtaining valuable wood species. Recognizing wood species is important to combat this, the study introduces a simplified acquisition process and deep learning models for wood classification, showing promising results.
In many countries, the wood industry is a crucial sector and has a significant economic impact. In this sense, illegal logging is a way to reduce costs, avoiding taxes, or having access to more valuable wood species. To combat the latter, the recognition of wood species is crucial. However, this task is usually performed by experts through visual inspection, a process that requires sanding and cleaning the wood surface, and an impractical task for use in the field. In this paper, the acquisition process was simplified and a new wood dataset was introduced, where a simple pocket knife cut is used to expose the timber section for inspection. Four deep learning models with transfer learning were investigated and compared with traditional pre-designed feature methods. Additionally, the models were evaluated with a cross-validation scheme to avoid any bias. The experimental results show that deep learning outperforms pre-design features for wood classification. DenseNet achieved 98.13% of accuracy, indicating that it could be applied to assist untrained agents in wood classification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available