4.7 Article

Survey of rapid development of environmental surveillance methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection in wastewater

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 769, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144852

Keywords

Environment surveillance; SARS-CoV-2; Wastewater-based epidemiology; Wastewater; Virus concentration

Funding

  1. Water Research Foundation, Denver, CO, United States of America

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Environmental surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater provides an early, cost-effective community-level indicator of COVID-19. Current research focuses on testing wastewater influent from large urban treatment plants using methods like polyethylene glycol precipitation, membrane filtration, and centrifugal ultrafiltration.
Environmental surveillance as a part of wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) of SARS-CoV-2 can provide an early, cost-effective, unbiased community-level indicator of circulating COVID-19 in a population. The objective of this study was to determine how widely SARS-CoV-2 detection in wastewater is being investigated and what methods are used. A survey was developed and distributed, with results showing that methods were rapidly applied to conduct SARS-CoV-2 WBE, primarily to test wastewater influent from large urban wastewater treatment plants. Additionally, most methods utilized small wastewater volumes and the primary concentration methods used were polyethylene glycol precipitation, membrane filtration and centrifugal ultrafiltration followed by nucleic acid extraction and assay for primarily nucleocapsid gene targets (N1, N2, and/or N3). Since this survey was performed, many laboratories have continued to optimize and implement a variety of methods for SARS-CoV-2 WBE. Method comparison studies completed since this survey was conducted will assist in developing WBE as a supplemental tool to support public health and policy decision making responses. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available