4.4 Article

Incorporating facilitative interactions into small-scale eelgrass restoration-challenges and opportunities

Journal

RESTORATION ECOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rec.13398

Keywords

ecosystem engineers; eelgrass; facilitation; interspecies interactions; mussels; restoration

Categories

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program as part of the project MERCES: Marine Ecosystem Restoration in Changing European Seas [689518]
  2. Estonian National Marine Monitoring program
  3. development fund of the Department of Marine Biology at the Estonian Marine Institute
  4. Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation [201900244]
  5. Abo Akademi University Foundation Sr
  6. NWO/TTW-OTP [14424]
  7. Natuurmonumenten
  8. STOWA
  9. Rijkswaterstaat
  10. Van Oord
  11. Bureau Waardenburg
  12. Enexio
  13. Rodenburg Biopolymers
  14. NWO/TTW-Vidi [16588]
  15. NWO-VENI [181.087]
  16. County Governor of Vestfold

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Marine ecosystem engineers, such as seagrasses and bivalves, play a critical role in creating important coastal habitats with high biodiversity. Small-scale restoration efforts using facilitative interactions, such as co-restoration with blue mussels and the use of biodegradable establishment structures (BESEs), have the potential to increase the success of restoring these habitats. While co-restoration with mussels did not show significant benefits at small scales, the use of BESEs proved to enhance early eelgrass survival and success in small-scale restoration projects.
Marine ecosystem engineers such as seagrasses and bivalves create important coastal habitats sustaining high biodiversity and ecosystem services. Restoring these habitats is difficult due to the importance of feedback mechanisms that can require large-scale efforts to ensure success. Incorporating facilitative interactions could increase the feasibility and success of small-scale restoration efforts, which would limit pressure on donor sites and reduce costs and time associated with restoration. Here, we tested two methods for providing facilitation in small-scale eelgrass (Zostera marina) restoration plots across northern Europe: (1) co-restoration with blue mussels (Mytilus edulis, M. trossulus); and (2) the use of biodegradable establishment structures (BESEs). Eelgrass-mussel co-restoration showed promise in aquaria, where eelgrass growth was nearly twice as high in treatments with medium and high mussel densities than in treatments without mussels. However, this did not translate to higher shoot length or shoot densities in subsequent field experiments. Rather, hydrodynamic exposure limited both eelgrass and mussel survival, especially in the most exposed sites. The use of BESEs showed more potential in enabling small-scale restoration success: they effectively enhanced eelgrass survival and reduced mussel loss, and showed potential for enabling mussel recruitment in one site. However, eelgrass planted in BESE plots along with mussels had a lower survival rate than eelgrass planted in BESE plots without mussels. Overall, we show that though co-restoration did not work at small scales, facilitation by using artificial structures (BESEs) can increase early eelgrass survival and success of small-scale eelgrass and bivalve restoration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available