Journal
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105210
Keywords
electric vehicle; environmental impact; LCA; regional heterogeneity; technological progress; consequential modeling
Categories
Funding
- International Cooperation and Exchanges NSFC [51861165202]
- Innovative Talents Promotion Plan of MOST [2015RA2268]
- National Key Research and Development Program of China Solid Waste Resource Utilization Special Project - Automobile Products and Typical Parts Lifecycle Traceability System Design and Demonstration Application Research [2018YFC1902704]
- China Scholarship Council [201906050172]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study compares the environmental impact of battery electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles with conventional internal combustion engine vehicles using vehicle models from the BYD Qin Pro series in China. The results show that while EVs offer reductions in global warming potential compared to ICEVs, there are considerable increases in mineral resource scarcity and ecological and human toxicity. Factors such as regional heterogeneity, technology improvement, and modeling methods significantly influence the environmental profiles of EVs and may reverse environmental priorities among different vehicle types.
In order to make the sustainable development of transport system, China has taken actions toward the electrification transition of vehicles. However, whether the electric vehicles (EVs) are more environmentally friendly than the conventional internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) in China is still not clear due to a lack of complete and consistent environmental impact comparison of vehicles. This study takes the vehicle models from BYD Qin Pro series in China as illustrations to compare the environmental impact of battery electric vehicle (BEV) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) with the conventional ICEV. The environmental profiles of vehicles across the whole life cycle within a set of environmental indicators are analyzed. The key aspects that may heavily influence the environmental impacts, i.e. regional heterogeneity, technology improvement and different modeling methods (attributional vs consequential) choices, are further tested, respectively. The results show that already today the BEV and PHEV powered by the current average Chinese electricity mix offer 23% and 17% reduction of global warming potential (GWP), respectively, compared to the gasoline ICEV. But it is achieved at the expense of considerable increases in mineral resource scarcity and ecological and human toxicity, etc. All of the factors considered show markedly influences on the environmental profiles of EVs, even up to 51% of GWP differences for different modeling methods application. And they all have the possibility to reverse the environmental priorities of some impact categories among ICEV, BEV and PHEV.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available