4.7 Review

The minimal seesaw and leptogenesis models

Journal

REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS
Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6633/abf086

Keywords

neutrino mass; flavor mixing; CP violation; minimal seesaw; leptogenesis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12075254, 11775231, 11835013, 11605081, 12047570]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Center for Excellence in Particle Physics
  3. Natural Science Foundation of the Liaoning Scientific Committee [2019-ZD-0473]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article provides an up-to-date review of the minimal seesaw mechanism in neutrino physics and cosmology, focusing on the flavor structures of this benchmark scenario and comparing its predictions with current experimental data and observational evidence. Specific attention is paid to topics such as lepton number violation, lepton flavor violation, discrete flavor symmetries, CP violation, and antimatter of the Universe.
Given its briefness and predictability, the minimal seesaw-a simplified version of the canonical seesaw mechanism with only two right-handed neutrino fields-has been studied in depth and from many perspectives, and now it is being pushed close to a position of directly facing experimental tests. This article is intended to provide an up-to-date review of various phenomenological aspects of the minimal seesaw and its associated leptogenesis mechanism in neutrino physics and cosmology. Our focus is on possible flavor structures of such benchmark seesaw and leptogenesis scenarios and confronting their predictions with current neutrino oscillation data and cosmological observations. In this connection particular attention will be paid to the topics of lepton number violation, lepton flavor violation, discrete flavor symmetries, CP violation and antimatter of the Universe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available