4.7 Article

MCDM and GIS based modelling technique for assessment of solar and wind farm locations in India

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 169, Issue -, Pages 865-884

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.056

Keywords

GIS; Multi-criteria decision making; Analytical hierarchy process; Site suitability analysis; Solar plant; Wind farm; India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study finds that India has suitable sites for solar and wind farms, especially in the state of Rajasthan. The proposed model can be used for policy development in renewable energy resources and assessment of project suitability.
In the recent past, various factors have led to an increase in the use of renewable energy sources, among which, the depleting fossil fuel reserves, increasing fuel prices, and rising environmental concerns are the most prominent. With this increasing reliance on renewable energy sources, a proper assessment of the suitable sites becomes necessary for the optimum utilization of these resources. The present study investigates the spatial suitability of the solar and wind farms locations in India based on the technical, economic, and socio-environmental perspectives. The analysis is performed with the coupled use of the Geographical Information System (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approaches. Analysis of present research work shows that 4.13% of the study area (133,874 km(2)) is highly suitable for the deployment of solar plants while 0.91% of the total area (29,457 km(2)) is highly suitable for the wind farms. The study further concludes that the Rajasthan state in India has the highest suitable land for the installation of solar plants (20,881 km(2)) as well as wind farms (6323 km(2)). The proposed model can be used for the development of policies related to renewable energy resources and the assessment of suitability of already sanctioned projects. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available