4.8 Article

Pinpointing the neural signatures of single-exposure visual recognition memory

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2021660118

Keywords

recognition memory; repetition suppression; contrast; population decoding; familiarity

Funding

  1. Simons Foundation [543033, 543047]
  2. National Eye Institute of the NIH [R01EY020851]
  3. NSF (CAREER award) [1265480]
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  5. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  6. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1265480] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Contrast modulation was found to have a significant effect on IT neural responses, leading to a discussion on repetition suppression and sensory referenced suppression and their impact on visual recognition memory behavior.
Memories of the images that we have seen are thought to be reflected in the reduction of neural responses in high-level visual areas such as inferotemporal (IT) cortex, a phenomenon known as repetition suppression (RS). We challenged this hypothesis with a task that required rhesus monkeys to report whether images were novel or repeated while ignoring variations in contrast, a stimulus attribute that is also known to modulate the overall IT response. The monkeys? behavior was largely contrast invariant, contrary to the predictions of an RS-inspired decoder, which could not distinguish responses to images that are repeated from those that are of lower contrast. However, the monkeys? behavioral patterns were well predicted by a linearly decodable variant in which the total spike count was corrected for contrast modulation. These results suggest that the IT neural activity pattern that best aligns with single-exposure visual recognition memory behavior is not RS but rather sensory referenced suppression: reductions in IT population response magnitude, corrected for sensory modulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available