4.6 Article

Development of multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250942

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia at lmam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University/Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC) [COVID19-2020-026-IRMC]
  2. Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC) [2020-IRMC-S-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study developed a multiplex rRT-PCR diagnostic method targeting two viral genes and one human gene, which was validated to be highly consistent with the CDC authorized diagnostic system, providing an accurate diagnostic approach for SARS-CoV-2.
The outbreak of the new human coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (also known as 2019-nCoV) continues to increase globally. The real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) is the most used technique in virus detection. However, possible false-negative and false-positive results produce misleading consequences, making it necessary to improve existing methods. Here, we developed a multiplex rRT-PCR diagnostic method, which targets two viral genes (RdRP and E) and one human gene (RP) simultaneously. The reaction was tested by using pseudoviral RNA and human target mRNA sequences as a template. Also, the protocol was validated by using 14 clinical SARS-CoV-2 positive samples. The results are in good agreement with the CDC authorized Cepheid`s Xpert((R)) Xpress SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic system (100%). Unlike single gene targeting strategies, the current method provides the amplification of two viral regions in the same PCR reaction. Therefore, an accurate SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic assay was provided, which allows testing of 91 samples in 96-well plates in per run. Thanks to this strategy, fast, reliable, and easy-to-use rRT-PCR method is obtained to diagnose SARS-CoV-2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available