4.7 Article

Design for the environment: Impact of regulatory policies on product development

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 248, Issue 2, Pages 558-570

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.043

Keywords

OR in environment and climate change; New Product Development (NPD); Environmental regulations; Synergies; Economies of scale

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Globally automakers are facing pressure from their stakeholders to follow sustainable business practices and produce products that are less harmful to the environment. The introduction of gas guzzling automobiles in the US market despite the increasingly stringent emission norms highlights the widening gap between the goals of the regulators and the automakers, demanding a fresh outlook at the regulatory framework. In this paper, we therefore propose a composite regulatory standard that not only allows the regulators to control various environmental standards, but also provides automakers with an opportunity to exploit scale economies and synergies in product development. Our results show that under composite regulations, sufficiently high economies of scale will ensure higher traditional and environmental qualities as well as higher profits for the automaker while operating in two markets as opposed to a single market. We also find under the composite regulations that, when more demanding norms are in place, despite positive synergies between traditional and environmental quality attributes, higher environmental quality is not guaranteed unless the scale economies are sufficiently high. Our work has implications for regulatory authorities in evaluating alternative policy design under heterogeneous market characteristics and technological synergies. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. and Association of European Operational Research Societies (EURO) within the International Federation of Operational Research Societies (IFORS). All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available