4.8 Article

Low-N protein engineering with data-efficient deep learning

Journal

NATURE METHODS
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 389-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-021-01100-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF GRFP Fellowship [DGE1745303]
  2. Center for Effective Altruism
  3. Open Philanthropy Project
  4. US Department of Energy, Office of Science [DE-FG02-02ER63445]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The approach introduced in this study utilizes machine learning to build accurate virtual fitness landscapes and screen millions of sequences via in silico directed evolution using minimal functionally assayed mutant sequences. This method not only helps in quickly identifying enhanced protein variants, but also efficiently utilizes resources for high-throughput screening.
Protein engineering has enormous academic and industrial potential. However, it is limited by the lack of experimental assays that are consistent with the design goal and sufficiently high throughput to find rare, enhanced variants. Here we introduce a machine learning-guided paradigm that can use as few as 24 functionally assayed mutant sequences to build an accurate virtual fitness landscape and screen ten million sequences via in silico directed evolution. As demonstrated in two dissimilar proteins, GFP from Aequorea victoria (avGFP) and E. coli strain TEM-1 beta-lactamase, top candidates from a single round are diverse and as active as engineered mutants obtained from previous high-throughput efforts. By distilling information from natural protein sequence landscapes, our model learns a latent representation of 'unnaturalness', which helps to guide search away from nonfunctional sequence neighborhoods. Subsequent low-N supervision then identifies improvements to the activity of interest. In sum, our approach enables efficient use of resource-intensive high-fidelity assays without sacrificing throughput, and helps to accelerate engineered proteins into the fermenter, field and clinic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available