4.6 Article

Toxicity assessment of industrial engineered and airborne process-generated nanoparticles in a 3D human airway epithelial in vitro model

Journal

NANOTOXICOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 542-557

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2021.1897698

Keywords

Ceramic technology; engineered nanoparticles; process-generated nanoparticles; MucilAir™ thermal spraying

Funding

  1. ERA-NET SIINN [16]
  2. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [SIINN/0004/2014]
  3. NanoBioBarriers project [PTDC/MED-TOX/31162/2017]
  4. Operational Program for Competitiveness and Internationalization (POCI) through European Regional Development Funds (FEDER/FNR)
  5. FCT
  6. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [PCIN-2015-173-C02-01, CEX2018-000794-S-Severo Ochoa]
  7. Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation (CCCDI-UEFISCDI) within PNCDI III [29/2016]
  8. FCT/MCTES [UIDB/04750/2020]
  9. FCT under the framework of Human Capital Operating Program (POCH) [SFRH/BD/120646/2016, SFRH/BD/101060/2014]
  10. European Union
  11. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/120646/2016, SIINN/0004/2014, SFRH/BD/101060/2014] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study highlighted the potential hazard associated with exposure to incidental nanoparticles in industrial settings. Results indicated that process-generated nanoparticles and fine particles possess higher toxicity potential compared to engineered nanoparticles in terms of mass per area unit. However, the presence of a mucociliary apparatus as a defense mechanism significantly attenuated the observed toxic effects.
The advanced ceramic technology has been pointed out as a potentially relevant case of occupational exposure to nanoparticles (NP). Not only when nanoscale powders are being used for production, but also in the high-temperature processing of ceramic materials there is also a high potential for NP release into the workplace environment. In vitro toxicity of engineered NP (ENP) [antimony tin oxide (Sb2O3 center dot SnO2; ATO); zirconium oxide (ZrO2)], as well as process-generated NP (PGNP), and fine particles (PGFP), was assessed in MucilAir (TM) cultures at air-liquid interface (ALI). Cultures were exposed during three consecutive days to varying doses of the aerosolized NP. General cytotoxicity [lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, WST-1 metabolization], (oxidative) DNA damage, and the levels of pro-inflammatory mediators (IL-8 and MCP-1) were assessed. Data revealed that ENP (5.56 mu g ATO/cm(2) and 10.98 mu g ZrO2/cm(2)) only caused mild cytotoxicity at early timepoints (24 h), whereas cells seemed to recover quickly since no significant changes in cytotoxicity were observed at late timepoints (72 h). No meaningful effects of the ENP were observed regarding DNA damage and cytokine levels. PGFP affected cell viability at dose levels as low as similar to 9 mu g/cm(2), which was not seen for PGNP. However, exposure to PGNP (similar to 4.5 mu g/cm(2)) caused an increase in oxidative DNA damage. These results indicated that PGFP and PGNP exhibit higher toxicity potential than ENP in mass per area unit. However, the presence of a mucociliary apparatus, as it occurs in vivo as a defense mechanism, seems to considerably attenuate the observed toxic effects. Our findings highlight the potential hazard associated with exposure to incidental NP in industrial settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available