4.6 Article

Characterizing the effects of titanium dioxide and silver nanoparticles released from painted surfaces due to weathering on zebrafish (Danio rerio)

Journal

NANOTOXICOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 527-541

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2021.1897173

Keywords

Nanotoxicology; nanomaterials; in vitro tests; aquatic toxicology; nTiO2 in paint; nAg in paint; weathering

Funding

  1. McGill Sustainability Systems Initiative (MSSI)
  2. Environment and Climate Change Canada
  3. Cascades Inc.
  4. NSERC [RGPIN-2019-04842, RGPIN-2016-05022, RGPAS-492998-16, STPGP 479090-2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research shows that nanoparticles released from paint, specifically nAg and nTiO(2), had different toxic effects on fish liver cells and zebrafish embryos. nAg released from paint caused differential gene expression and increased mortality and deformities in embryos, while nTiO(2) released from paint only resulted in differential gene expression without major phenotypic abnormalities.
Silver (nAg) and titanium dioxide nanoparticles (nTiO(2)) are common engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) added into paint for their antimicrobial and whitening properties, respectively. Weathering of outdoor painted surfaces can release such ENPs, though little is known about the potential effects of released ENPs on aquatic species. The objective of this study was to characterize the toxicity of nAg and nTiO(2) released from painted panels using fish liver cells (CRL2643) and zebrafish embryos (OECD 236 embryotoxicity test). Cells and embryos were exposed to suspensions of pristine nAg or nTiO(2), panels (unpainted or painted with nAg or nTiO(2)) or base paint, after sonication. Cell viability and gene expression were assessed using resazurin assay and qPCR, respectively, while embryo mortality and deformities were scored visually via microscopic examination. In the cell studies, both paint-released nanoparticles did not affect viability, but paint-released nAg resulted in differential expression of a few genes including gclc and ncf1. In embryos, paint-released nAg increased mortality and incidence of deformities, whereas paint-released nTiO(2) resulted in differential expression of several genes including gclc, ncf1, txnrd1, gpx1b, and cyp1c1 but without major phenotypic abnormalities. Comparing the two types of exposures, paint-released exposures affected both molecular (gene expression) and apical (embryotoxicity) endpoints, while pristine exposures affected the expression of some genes but had no apical effects. The differing effects of paint-released and pristine nanoparticle exposures suggest that further research is needed to further understand how paint coatings (and the products of their weathering and aging) may influence nanoparticle toxicity to aquatic organisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available