4.7 Article

A reliable model for estimating the turbulence intensity and integrated astroclimatic parameters from sounding data

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 503, Issue 4, Pages 5692-5703

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab515

Keywords

turbulence; balloons; methods: data analysis

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA17010104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91752103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a new outer-scale model for estimating refractive index structure constant profiles and calculating astroclimatic parameters. Compared with other classical models, the correlation coefficients in Lhasa and Rongcheng reach 0.88 and 0.87, respectively, demonstrating the superior performance of the new model.
The vertical distributions of atmospheric turbulence (c(n)(2)) are key factors in determining the performance of ground-based telescopes and interferometers. As site-testing campaigns are extremely expensive, atmospheric modelling may represent the estimated results of astronomical sites. We propose a new outer-scale model to estimate refractive index structure constant (c(n)(2)) profiles containing potential temperature and wind shear. The integrated astroclimatic parameters (Fried parameter r(0), seeing epsilon, isoplanatic angle theta(0), and coherence time tau(0)) can also be calculated using this outer-scale model. Radiosonde measurements from a filed campaign at libet (Lhasa) and Rongcheng (Shandong) are utilized to quantify the performance of this model. Compared with the Dewan model, HMNSP99 model and Thorpe model, the new model gives better results as a profile and an astroclimatic parameter estimator. Compared with the measured median profile, the correlation coefficient reaches 0.88 in Lhasa and 0.87 in Rongcheng.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available