4.7 Article

Prediction of oil flow rate through orifice flow meters: Optimized machine-learning techniques

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 174, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108943

Keywords

Oil flow rate measurement; Machine-learning-optimizer algorithms; Orifice plate meters; Discharge coefficients; Beta ratios; Differential pressure; Optimized variable weights

Funding

  1. Tomsk Polytechnic University [VIU-CPPSND-214/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flow measurement is crucial for monitoring and controlling oil movements, and this study evaluated a dataset from southwestern Iran to predict oil flow rates using hybrid machine learning-optimizer models. The ABC-DWKNN Plus MLP-FF model achieved the highest prediction accuracy, removing the need for unreliable empirical formulas in flow calculations.
Flow measurement is an essential requirement for monitoring and controlling oil movements through pipelines and facilities. However, delivering reliably accurate measurements through certain meters requires cumbersome calculations that can be simplified by using supervised machine learning techniques exploiting optimizers. In this study, a dataset of 6292 data records with seven input variables relating to oil flow through 40 pipelines plus processing facilities in southwestern Iran is evaluated with hybrid machine-learning-optimizer models to predict a wide range of oil flow rates (Qo) through orifice plate meters. Distance-weighted K-nearest-neighbor (DWKNN) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) algorithms are coupled with artificial-bee colony (ABC) and firefly (FF) swarmtype optimizers. The two-stage ABC-DWKNN Plus MLP-FF model achieved the highest prediction accuracy (root mean square errors = 8.70 stock-tank barrels of oil per day) for oil flow rate through the orifice plates, thereby removing dependence on unreliable empirical formulas in such flow calculations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available